MrBadmusAI
  1. KS3
  2. Biology
  3. Ecosystems and interdependence
  4. Food chains and food webs

Ecosystems and interdependence · System

Food chains and food webs

Nobody has ever found a food chain with ten links in it. There is a reason, it is arithmetic, and it decides the shape of every ecosystem on Earth.

Start here

Why is there no animal that eats the animal that eats the eagle?

Chains stop. Grass, rabbit, fox — and then nothing. Four or five links is about the limit anywhere in the world, on land or at sea, and the rule holds whether the organisms are enormous or microscopic.

What stops food chains getting longer?

At the bench · climb the chain

Follow the energy up

level 1 of 4

Watch what arrives at each level — and where the rest of it went.

The chain

  1. Grass

    Producer

    10,000 kJ

    100% of the original

    Ten thousand kilojoules captured from sunlight and built into plant material.

  2. Rabbits

    Primary consumer

  3. Foxes

    Secondary consumer

  4. Golden eagle

    Tertiary consumer

Everyone has a job title

A web is chains that share their members.

  • Bottom of every chain

    Producers

    Plants and algae. They do not eat — they build their own food, so they are the point where energy enters the living world.

  • Level two

    Primary consumers

    Herbivores: the animals that eat producers. The most numerous animals in almost every ecosystem, because this is where the food is.

  • Levels three and up

    Secondary and tertiary consumers

    Predators, and the predators of predators. Rarer at every step up, and each one needs a larger area to feed from.

  • Everywhere at once

    Decomposers

    Bacteria and fungi feeding on dead material and droppings from every level. They are not the end of the chain — they are underneath all of it, returning the minerals to the soil.

Key fact

The arrows in a food chain show the direction energy travels, so they point from the organism being eaten to the organism eating it. Only about a tenth of the energy at each level reaches the next, which is why chains are short and top predators are rare.

A food chain is one route through an ecosystem. A food web is all the routes at once, drawn on top of each other, because almost nothing eats only one thing and almost nothing is eaten by only one thing. The web is the truthful picture; the chain is a single thread pulled out of it so it can be talked about.

A food web in an oak wood, with one food chain marked through itOrganisms in an oak wood arranged in rows by what they eat. Producers at the bottom: the oak and wildflowers. Above them the plant eaters: caterpillars and aphids on the oak, mice on acorns and seeds, and bees. Above those, animals that eat plant eaters: blue tits on caterpillars and aphids, ladybirds on aphids alone, owls on mice. At the top a sparrowhawk, eating blue tits — and also mice, a line that reaches down past a whole row, which is why a web is not a ladder. Fungi and bacteria sit in their own row off the ladder, feeding on dead material from every level. Every arrow points from the organism being eaten towards the one eating it, because that is the direction the energy travels. One chain is marked in orange and numbered: 1 the oak, 2 caterpillars, 3 blue tits, 4 the sparrowhawk. A dashed line from the bees to the wildflowers is labelled pollinates, and carries no energy.TERTIARYeats a predatorSECONDARYeats a plant eaterPRIMARYeats a producerPRODUCERScaptures sunlightDECOMPOSERSoff the ladder — every levelpollinatesSparrowhawk4Blue tits3LadybirdsOwlsCaterpillars2AphidsMiceBeesThe oak1WildflowersFungi and bacteriapoints from the eaten to the eater — the way the energy goesone numbered chain, pulled out of the webdashed: pollination, which moves no energy
One oak wood. The numbered orange chain is one route through it — the same four steps the bench above climbs.

Think again

“The arrow points at what the animal eats.”

Draw it that way and every arrow in the diagram is backwards. The arrow is not saying eats; it is saying energy travels this way, so it always points from the eaten towards the eater — grass to rabbit, rabbit to fox. The fox does not send anything to the rabbit. Once you read arrows as energy rather than as appetite, several things become easy: you can see instantly which organisms are producers, because nothing points into them from another organism; you can count how many steps energy has taken from the Sun; and a food web stops looking like a tangle and starts looking like a map of where the energy goes. Examiners mark arrow direction, and it is the single most common lost mark in this topic.

“Ninety per cent of the energy is lost at each level.”

Lost is the wrong word, and you have already met why in Conservation of energy: energy is never destroyed, so it has to be somewhere. Follow it. Most of it was released by respiration and ended up warming the surroundings — a rabbit spends most of what it eats simply staying alive and staying warm. Some passes out undigested and goes to the decomposers, along with everything in the rabbit when it eventually dies. A little is in parts the fox does not eat. Nothing has gone missing; it has left this chain, which is a different claim. The reason the number matters is not bookkeeping but shape: it makes each level about a tenth the size of the one below, and after four or five levels there is nothing left to build an animal out of.

Mastery ladder

Not started yet.

Rungs 3 and 4 you mark yourself.

Rung 1 · Read the arrows

A food chain is written: lettuce, slug, hedgehog. Which way do the arrows point, and why?

Rung 2 · The one that catches people

Only about 10% of the energy at one level reaches the next. What happened to the other 90%?

Rung 3 · Explain the shape

In almost every ecosystem there are far more producers than primary consumers, and far more primary consumers than top predators. Explain why, and say what would have to be true for an ecosystem to have more foxes than rabbits.

Rung 4 · Take it somewhere new

A country wants to feed more people from the same farmland. An adviser suggests converting land currently used to raise cattle over to growing wheat. Explain the energy argument in favour, and give one honest limitation of it.

Key note

Producers capture energy from sunlight; consumers get theirs by eating; decomposers release the rest back. Arrows point in the direction energy travels, from eaten to eater. About a tenth of the energy at each level reaches the next, the rest having been used in respiration or passed to decomposers, which is why food chains are short and a food web has far more organisms at the bottom than at the top.

Going further

The same arithmetic decides what a country can feed itself on. A hectare of wheat eaten as bread feeds people at the first consumer level; the same hectare grown as feed for cattle and eaten as beef feeds them at the second, with about a tenth as much arriving. That is not an argument that nobody should eat beef — cattle graze land that will not grow wheat, and grass is inedible to us — but it is why the two are not interchangeable, and why the question of how much land a diet requires has a hard number attached to it. The same rule explains something odder at sea: whales are enormous, and the largest of them feed on krill, only two levels up. An animal that size at the fifth level is impossible, so the biggest animals that have ever existed eat some of the smallest.

Before this lesson

Connects to

At GCSE this becomes

  • Trophic levels, pyramids of biomass, and calculating the efficiency of energy transfer between levels.

Where to next

Ask Mr Badmus AI

Want to build a chain from your own local wildlife?

Mr. Badmus AI

KS3 Science Tutor

preview