MrBadmusAI
  1. KS3
  2. Biology
  3. Evolution, extinction and biodiversity
  4. Variation and competitive success

Evolution, extinction and biodiversity · System

Variation and competitive success

No two individuals in a population are identical. Most of the time that is a curiosity. When something goes wrong — a drought, a cold winter, a new predator — it becomes the most important fact about them.

Start here

A thick coat is an advantage. Until it is not.

Two mice in the same litter, one with a noticeably thicker coat. Which of them does better depends entirely on what happens next — and the same is true of every difference between them: size, speed, appetite, colour, boldness.

Which variation in a population is the best one to have?

At the bench · one population, five conditions

Change the world, not the mice

1 of 5 conditions tried

The same five mice every time. Only the conditions change. Watch one mouse across all five and see how often the same animal is at the top and at the bottom.

The conditions

A hard winter, snow for eight weeks

Food is scarce and buried, and the cold is relentless. Losing heat is now the main way to die.

  • Large, heavy build

    70% survive

    A large body loses heat more slowly than a small one, and fat reserves last. It also needs more food, which is scarce.

  • Thick coat

    90% survive · best here

    Insulation is exactly what this winter demands, and it costs almost nothing to carry.

  • Small and quick

    45% survive · worst here

    A small body loses heat fast relative to its mass, and speed is no defence against cold.

  • Bold and exploratory

    55% survive

    Willing to search further for buried food, which helps — and is exposed to the cold while doing it.

  • Pale sandy fur

    75% survive

    Pale fur against snow is difficult for an owl to see, which is worth a great deal in a winter with no cover.

The thick coat wins, and it is the mouse that will suffer most in the next environment on the list.

What they are competing for

More are born than can possibly survive.

  • Between members of one species

    Food and water

    The most common competition, and the one that bites first. Every organism eating the same thing in the same place is a rival.

  • Between members of one species

    Space and shelter

    Territory, a burrow, a nest site, a place on the rock. Often more limiting than food, and usually settled by size or by who arrived first.

  • Between members of one species

    Mates

    Only some individuals breed. This is where fitness is finally counted, because surviving without reproducing contributes nothing to the next generation.

  • Against everything else

    Predators and disease

    Not competition exactly, but the same filter: whichever variations happen to help you avoid being eaten or infected are the ones that get passed on.

Key fact

Individuals of a species vary, and resources are limited, so some compete more successfully than others. Which variation gives an advantage depends entirely on the conditions, and the conditions change — so there is no such thing as a generally superior individual.

Think again

“Survival of the fittest means the strongest survive.”

Fittest here means best fitted to these conditions, in the sense that a key fits a lock — not fittest in the sense of a gym. It is regularly the small, the drab and the unimpressive that come through. In a drought, the animal that needs least water wins; in a famine, the one that survives on least food; against a new disease, the one that happens to be resistant, which may be the sickliest animal in the group in every other respect. A stag with enormous antlers wins fights and starves in a hard winter carrying them. And the measure is not survival at all in the end — it is how many surviving offspring an individual leaves. An organism that lives fifty years and never breeds has a fitness of zero; a mayfly that lives one day and lays five hundred eggs has done everything that counts.

“Some individuals are just better than others.”

Better at what, and in what conditions? Change the environment on the bench above and the ranking reshuffles, using the same five animals with the same five sets of characteristics. A large mouse dominates a food pile and needs more of it; a bold mouse finds new food first and meets the owl first; a thick coat is life in January and a burden in July. This is why biologists are careful to say well adapted to a particular environment rather than advanced or superior, and it is not a politeness. A species that is superbly suited to one place is, by that same specialisation, badly placed if the place changes — which is precisely how extinctions happen, and it is the subject of When the environment changes: extinction.

Mastery ladder

Not started yet.

Rungs 3 and 4 you mark yourself.

Rung 1 · Advantage in context

Pale sandy fur is an advantage in snow and a disadvantage on dark soil. What does that show?

Rung 2 · The one that catches people

What does "fittest" mean in "survival of the fittest"?

Rung 3 · Explain a reversal

On the bench, the thick-coated mouse is the most likely to survive the winter and the least likely to survive the drought. Explain both results, and say what this means for the idea of a "better" animal.

Rung 4 · Take it somewhere new

On the disease bench, none of the five visible variations protects the mice. Explain why a population still benefits from having lots of variation it is not currently using, and what that implies for a population reduced to very few individuals.

Key note

Individuals within a species vary, and more offspring are produced than the resources can support, so they compete — for food, water, space, mates and escape from predators. Variations that suit the current conditions make an individual more likely to survive and reproduce. Which variations those are depends on the conditions, so no variation is an advantage in general.

Going further

Peter and Rosemary Grant spent forty years measuring finches on Daphne Major, a small island in the Galápagos, catching and weighing almost every bird on it year after year. In the drought of 1977 the small soft seeds ran out and only the large tough ones were left, and the finches with slightly deeper, stronger beaks survived at a much higher rate. The average beak depth in the population measurably increased in a single generation. Then in 1983 came exceptional rains, the small soft seeds returned in abundance, and the average beak size went back down. That is the whole of this lesson in one data set: the same variation, an advantage in one year and a disadvantage six years later, with no bird ever changing its own beak. It is also one of the few places where evolution has been watched happening rather than reconstructed afterwards.

Before this lesson

Connects to

At GCSE this becomes

  • Selection pressures, adaptation, and the evidence for evolution from the fossil record and from living populations.

Where to next

Ask Mr Badmus AI

Want to test a variation against conditions of your own?

Mr. Badmus AI

KS3 Science Tutor

preview